Sunday, 25 November 2007

Just a cracking conference

I was at the Scottish Sports Development Conference this week at Crieff Hydro. First day highlights:
  • Stewart Harris (CEO, sportscotland) did the introduction (and will speak further tomorrow). I detected that he thought that sportscotland would continue to exist though its focus and remit would change. Otherwise, he did not say much else, as this was just the opening.
  • Keith Brown replaced the minister, Stewart Maxwell, who was ill. He spoke of the need to think about legacy for events, the balance between elite & grass roots, the need to keep driving that sports should be recognized as contributors to nation and community development, concern that the new PPP school estate is not being fully utilized by the community, and concerns about inequality in Council spend on sport (£36-£166 per capita). No real new messages there.
  • Dr Pat Duffy, CEO sport coach UK, was most inspiring. He spoke of the challenges of being participant focused, maximizing front line delivery and defining the coaching model, all of which forms the basis for the UKCC. He then went on to speak about new thinking around classifying coaching by age range (child, juvenile, adult) and by type (from community to master) and for sports to build that into their planning. He spoke of a move for coaching to be professionally regulated, embedded into policy and for coaching to recognize that it needed to work with other professionals (officials, administrators, planners, physiologists etc) to make a real difference. Coaching can’t make UK Sport great on its own, was his words. He added that his estimate would be that 40,000 coach (FTE equivalents) being in place by 2016.
  • Nolette Rennie OBE, CEO Sporting Equals, talked about her work in addressing the racial part of equity and the government’s desire to decrease under representation (race, disability, female) by 1% per annum to 2012. She has funding of £2M invested in English projects as early adopter programs to provide evidence and case studies. She added that, in race, you will be successful if you reach out and engage with existing race community groups, understand their barriers, and work with them for solutions.
  • The workshop on the culture of clubs was interesting. Amongst all the delegates, everyone had their head round the issues. The SFA presented on their Quality Mark scheme (in content like many others) and I noted that: they link their levels to equity (e.g. bringing in females); they support well through their development officers, run urban workshops, and have web/telephone solutions for rural; they incentivise through discount on coach education, priority booking for conferences, automatically endorse funding applications, provide free first aid & child protection training, and advertise on their web site. A major issue in the PPP contracts and the difficulty in access to the school estate. Another major issue is the lack on joining up, at a local level, Active School co-ordinators, Council sport development officers and NGB clubs – the SFA took several months to complete a mapping exercise in the Lothians that identified facilities, who used them and where the local clubs were. They interestingly utilize the EC’s Leonardo fund to arrange transnational visits between clubs here and on the continent.

Second day highlights:

  • The day started with Dr Mark Nesti of York St John University talking about the application of existentialist psychology to sport. A good speaker to start a second day off after a heavy conference dinner. In a nutshell, he said that there is too much of a focus on process in sport (though process is important) and that athletes/coaches with skill/techniques and no personality will fail (as personality gives core values and strength). He invited the audience to contact such individuals in their organizations and suggest the move to roles more suited to their capabilities and where they can develop their personalities.
  • I attend a coaching CPD workshop around the introduction of the UKCC into Scotland which was surprisingly different from what I thought it would be. There has been quite a bit of tartanising linked to funding that includes creation of SQA units, becoming an SQA centres and being externally moderated by the SQA. Most of this is supported though. I’ve written separately to Bill Mackay and Ollie on this.
  • After lunch there were some short presentations and I attended the one on Scottish University Sport. It appeared to me that these guys (and the UK equivalent) were getting their act together in increasing sporting participation and outreach to communities.
  • The afternoon sessions started with Derek Casey talking about how Glasgow won 2014, very inspiring. I had no idea how much effort they put in: visited 67 out of 71 commonwealth countries; had as many visit Glasgow; had 1.5M Scots pledge support for the bid; utilize 70% of existing venues and only build 30% new. He reminded us all that 2014 will not only have a profound effect on sport in Scotland but will also hugely impact and strengthen our communities.
  • The afternoon ended with Stewart Harris, CEO of sportscotland, reflecting on the conference and noting that can do attitude, clear responsibilities and collective energy are all success factors. Issues still remain around club facilities and we need to do more to employ & deploy coaches effectively and raise professional standards. He closed with thank us all and reminding that sometimes we forget to thank volunteers enough.

The week ended with shooting with Penicuik on Friday night and good chat and then at Montrose for the indoor. I saw Sandy Gregory (who incidentally is on one of the photos in the sportscotland boadroom, in his pre-white hair days) who was shooting both morning and afternoon, I think - none of this part-time stuff for the boys in the wheelchairs.

Sunday, 18 November 2007

A week of bits & pieces

I wonder if it is widely recognised just how much work gets done at all levels by the volunteers. There are, of course, many of these from people who work in Clubs and Coaching, perhaps the most visible, through those who run & officiate at events, obvious to tournament archers, and lastly to those who work in the background at county, regional and national level. GNAS has a turnover of roughly £1million but if the volunteering effort is counted in, the estimate is something like five times that amount.

At the Board level, only one of the executive directors (the CEO) is salaried and the others (Chairman, Finance, Operations & Marketing) only receive expenses and work anything between full- and part-time. The National Directors are all non-executive, unpaid apart from expenses and work from a few hours to a day a week.

It is a very sobering thought that there are just so many unsung heroes.

This week, I have been looking at the Equity Action plan which is beginning its consultation phase (something to look out for in the coming months). It is being managed by an outside consultancy, SportStructures, who are doing a very professional and competent job. I think that it is a feature of the maturity of GNAS that it feels comfortable to engage outside agencies where specialist knowledge is required.

Locally, sportscotland has said it would like a representative from the SAA to be on the Equity committee to comply with its requirements. That opportunity has been created but a volunteer is needed - come on Scotland, someone needs to join in!

There have been areas of regulation that some clubs have found it difficult to assimilate like Child Protection which everyone would have no problem in supporting. Equity is another regulatory area that is coming from UK Sport, but it will have genuine opportunities to think about how we practice archery and engage with all the sections of our society. This should lead on to more participation as we open doors to all - I am encouraged in talking to the Director for England and her county's work in areas of multi-culturalism in, for example, Bradford.

Being November, it was time to get the bow out and start to shoot indoor. I don't much like being cooped up inside but it is good preparation for outdoors. I was glad that I still remembered what to do and could hit the target.

Her indoors told me of a spelling mistake but wasn't too specific where (I am expecing a lot of support from the lads on this one). Anyway, it is now found and corrected.

Sunday, 11 November 2007

Formats, shields, money, coaches and 2014

I continue to work with the CEO and fellow Directors to improve the "look and feel" of our publications - you may have noticed the format of the new Equity Policy. This week I was working on the format of the Board paper with David Sherratt, the CEO.

I read of the SAA's need to move away from the traditional shield and wrote to say that the new "Archery UK" logo can be adapted to Home Nations use, perhaps replacing the "UK" with Scotland or a Thistle. However, I guess that there is a need to find a logo that is acceptable to the membership and represents the Nation that is Scotland.

I also read of the reduction of the SAA's reserves and am personally concerned as the National Council (of which I am one) has the responsibility for financial management.

There are two great notes to end on.

First is the money allocated from sportscotland for support towards the Commonwealth Games in 2010. I wrote again to the SAA National Council saying that GNAS would sympathetically receive a proposal for additional funding.

Second is the 2014 Commonwealth Games result. I phoned the GNAS Chair to discuss and found that the ball had already been set rolling (with a contact to FITA) on looking at how that event (and the 2012 Olympics) would impact on Scottish archery. Just in case people don't know, GNAS, FITA and others made strenuous efforts to get archery into the Glasgow bid. The ball may have been set rolling but this is the start of a longish road with many discussion and profiling work still to take place.

Just Starting

I've been thinking about how to improve communications between the National Director for Scotland post and the archers on the ground. Having spoken to friends and colleagues (yes!), I'm encouraged to try cyberspace and have chosen blogging, mainly because buletin boards (an other alternative) are just too busy for me.

Well, I've started now and hopefully I'll write something every week.

These are, of course, my personal reflections and are not "official policy", whatever that means.